Solidly decentralized users complain about the loss of funds – Bits Media

The creator of the popular Defi Yarn.finance project launched a decentralized Solidly Exchange 24 february, However, users of the site complain about the loss of funds during the exchange.

As the user wrote under the pseudonym Niqlaus, He exchanged FTM tokens for RDL through a decentralized Solidly exchange, However, I received everything 0.01% From the expected funds. After analyzing, Niqlaus suggested, that the protocol chose a stable Samm-WFTM/RDL pool instead of a dynamic with the same name.

Since there was practically no liquidity on a stable bullet, The user could not get his funds. Wherein, Niqlaus emphasized, There were no warnings in the interface. He suggested, that the user interface (UI) I transferred incorrect data to the smart contract.

Andre Kronya (Other cronje) answered, what, In his opinion, There are no problems in the work of the exchange. He considers, that the user accidentally chose an illiquid pool and therefore lost funds. At the same time, the developer shared the screenshots of the code, in which he emphasized, that there are no amounts of amounts and all, What is shown in UI, It is transmitted to a smart contract. At the same time, Kronya recognized, that the developers have already received several such messages.

“The main reason for the use of a stable pool instead of a variable may be, that one of the calls of RPC procedures or did not return anything, or returned 0 ", - wrote Crinier.

The user NIQLAUS recognized, that during the transaction there were errors, associated with UI or RPC. However, he would never sign a transaction, If there was a warning about the loss 99% Means. He stressed, that far from a newcomer in cryptocurrencies. Later, a message from another user appeared in the same topic on GitHub, who exchanged $24 000 USDC on the FTM tokens, However, I only got it $600 в ftm.

Recall, what's in september 2020 year Crinier launched the Eminence gaming protocol, However, it found critical vulnerability and investors lost $15 million.